Neurodegeneration & the basal ganglia
Cerebellar ataxia, Parkinson's, Huntington's and Alzheimer's — for each: cause, brain area, symptoms, and what it taught us about the healthy brain. The centrepiece is the go / no-go circuit, which you should be able to trace arrow by arrow.
1. Neural degeneration
| Disease | Where | Cause | Onset / course | Hallmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebellar degeneration | Cerebellum | Often hereditary (autosomal dominant & recessive; ~40 types) | — | Ataxia |
| Parkinson's | Dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra → basal ganglia "go" pathway | Not fully understood; mostly sporadic, not inherited; pesticides; multiple strokes | 40–80 yrs; progresses over 10–20 yrs | Bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor at rest, loss of righting reflex |
| Huntington's | Striatum → "no-go" pathway | Genetic mutation | ~40 yrs; 10–15 yrs | Chorea, dementia |
| Alzheimer's | Global; heavy hippocampal degeneration | Amyloid plaques + tau tangles | Gradual, 60–80 yrs | Dementia; can't form new memories |
2. The cerebellum and ataxia
The cerebellum is often neglected, but it contains more than 80% of the neurons in the brain. Its degeneration (usually hereditary) causes ataxia: uncoordinated movement — under- and overshooting targets.
The lecture asks you to think at Marr's algorithmic level: what does the cerebellum compute, such that losing it produces overshooting? The answer: it generates sensory predictions — the predicted sensory outcome of a movement. Sensory feedback is slow; by the time you feel where your hand is, it has moved on. A prediction lets you plan the next correction without waiting.
3. The basal ganglia: go and no-go
The basal ganglia decide how vigorously to move. They do it with a chain of inhibitions, which is why the logic feels backwards. The one rule to hold on to: the GPi (globus pallidus internal) is a brake on the thalamus, and the thalamus excites the cortex to move. Everything else either presses or releases that brake.
Trace it by hand: Parkinson's
The lecture's chain, one arrow at a time:
- Loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra → less excitatory dopamine input to the striatum
- → striatum less activated
- → less inhibition of the GPi (so the GPi is more active)
- → more inhibition of the thalamus
- → less excitatory input to cortex → less vigorous movement.
| PD cardinal symptom | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| Bradykinesia | Slowness of movement (extreme form: freezing of gait) |
| Rigidity | Stiffness |
| Tremor at rest | ~3 Hz, goes away with purposeful movement |
| Loss of righting reflex | Can't recover balance when pushed |
Two treatments and their problems
Huntington's: the no-go pathway breaks
The lecture's exercise: "What happens if I lesion the striatum — more or less movement?" In Huntington's, the striatal neurons lost are the ones driving the no-go (indirect) pathway, whose normal job is to inhibit movement. The chain:
- Loss of striatal neurons → less inhibition of GPe (GPe more active)
- → STN more inhibited
- → less excitation of GPi
- → less inhibition of thalamus → more involuntary movement.
Result: chorea ("to dance") — involuntary, irregular muscle movements, a special type of dyskinesia — plus dementia (global cognitive deficits).
Suppose a drug selectively silences the GPe. More or less movement?
Step 1 — What does GPe normally do?
GPe inhibits the STN.
Step 2 — Follow the chain
GPe silenced → STN released (more active) → STN excites GPi more → GPi brakes the thalamus harder → less cortical excitation.
Answer & the takeaway
Less movement (Parkinson-like). The skill: find the GPi, then count signs. Anything that ends up raising GPi activity reduces movement; anything that lowers it increases movement.
4. Alzheimer's disease
Global neurodegeneration causing dementia (global cognitive deficits), gradual onset at 60–80. Two molecular culprits — learn which is between and which is inside neurons:
Alzheimer's hits the hippocampus especially hard — and that tells us what the hippocampus is for. The lecture's question: what has Alzheimer's taught us about memory? Consider dissociations between impaired and intact abilities.
| Memory type | In Alzheimer's | Definition & example |
|---|---|---|
| Working memory | ✓ Intact | Temporarily hold and manipulate small amounts of info — a phone number long enough to dial it |
| Long-term memory | ✓ Intact | Well-consolidated memories from the past — childhood events, family names |
| "Short-term" memory (course's term) | ✗ Impaired | Forming and retaining new memories over minutes to hours — a recent conversation, where you put your keys |
Alzheimer's damages much of the brain. How can you claim the hippocampus is specifically for forming new memories, rather than the patients just being generally impaired?
Step 1 — Which weakness is this?
The "general impairment" weakness of a single measure (Ch. 5).
Step 2 — What rules it out?
The spared abilities. Working memory and old long-term memory are intact in the same patients — generally impaired patients wouldn't be fine on those. That's a dissociation.
Answer & the takeaway
Show intact performance on comparably demanding tasks (dissociation), and ideally find the reverse pattern elsewhere (double dissociation). Also match task difficulty so the spared tasks aren't just easier — avoid ceiling effects. The same logic from Ch. 5, applied to a disease.
The humanities side: philosopher Iris Murdoch described Alzheimer's as "an insidious fog, barely noticeable until everything around has disappeared." Artist William Utermohlen (diagnosed 1995) painted self-portraits that document the disease's gradual effects.